A dialogue between the poet Simonides and the tyrant Hiero about whether the tyrant's life is really enviable. Hiero reveals that power brings fear, isolation, and the impossibility of genuine friendship.
Start ReadingThe poet Simonides visits the tyrant Hiero and asks him: who is happier, the private citizen or the ruler? Hiero says the citizen.
Hiero describes the tyrant's pleasures — food, drink, sex. All of them are spoiled by excess, suspicion, and the impossibility of trust.
The tyrant and love. No one loves a tyrant freely. Every display of affection might be fear or flattery. Hiero cannot tell the difference.
The tyrant and friendship. The man who can have anyone killed cannot have a friend. Friendship requires equality, and the tyrant has no equal.
The tyrant and travel. A citizen can move freely; a tyrant is a prisoner of his own power. Every journey is a military operation.
The tyrant and war. In victory, the tyrant gains nothing — he already has everything. In defeat, he loses everything, including his life.
The tyrant and trust. He must arm his bodyguard and disarm his citizens. The men who protect him are the men he fears most.
The universal hatred. Private citizens are hated only by enemies; the tyrant is hated by everyone. He knows it. He cannot escape it.
Simonides responds. A benevolent ruler can overcome these problems. Use your power to help, not to harm, and the hatred will turn to gratitude.
Practical advice: the good ruler should compete in beneficence rather than force. Make the city prosperous and the citizens will defend you willingly.
Simonides' conclusion: the ruler who governs for the common good will be loved rather than feared, guarded by devotion rather than mercenaries, and remembered after death as a hero rather than a tyrant.